Google asks U.S. appeals court to reject app store monopoly verdict

Share This Post

[ad_1]

Alphabet’s Google asked a U.S. appeals court to throw out a jury verdict and a judge’s order forcing it to revamp its app store. File

Alphabet’s Google asked a U.S. appeals court to throw out a jury verdict and a judge’s order forcing it to revamp its app store. File
| Photo Credit: AP

Alphabet’s Google asked a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday (November 27, 2024) to throw out a jury verdict and a judge’s order forcing it to revamp its app store Play.

In its first detailed argument to the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Google said the trial judge made legal errors that unfairly benefited the plaintiff, “Fortnite” maker Epic Games.

Requiring a “dramatic redesign” of Google Play and its mobile-device operating system Android will hurt app developers and consumers, Google said in its court filing.

Also Read: Apple urges judge to end U.S. smartphone monopoly case

Epic’s 2020 lawsuit accused Google of monopolizing how consumers access apps on Android devices and how they pay for transactions within apps. The Cary, North Carolina-based company persuaded a San Francisco jury last year that Google illegally stifled competition.

Based on the jury’s findings, U.S. District Judge James Donato ordered Google in October to let users download rival app stores within Play and make Play’s app catalog available to those competitors, among other reforms.

The order, which would bind Google for three years, is on hold pending review in the 9th Circuit.

Google told the appeals court on Wednesday that a jury should never have heard Epic’s lawsuit because it sought to enjoin Google’s conduct, not collect damages. It said Donato unfairly allowed Epic to tell jurors that Google and Apple are not competitors for app distribution and in-app payments.

The filing said Donato was wrong to issue an injunction affecting users and developers nationwide, not just Epic. Google said the order made Donato “a central planner responsible for product design.”

The 9th Circuit said it will hear oral arguments on Feb. 3, with a ruling expected later next year.

[ad_2]

Source link

spot_img

Related Posts

Εγγραφή με Μπόνους: Τι Προσφέρουν οι Δημοφιλείς Στοιχηματικές

Η πρώτη εντύπωση μετράει – και οι στοιχηματικές το...

Talk Fusion 2.0: The Game-Changer in Video Marketing

Still Chasing Shiny Objects Online? Time to Go All-In...

How Streamers Are Profiting From 92 Pak Game

The Rise of 92 Pak Game in the Streaming...

How UFABET Makes Football Betting More Accessible

Football betting has long been a favorite pastime for...

Real Money Pokies Online No Deposit Offers: Unlocking Free Fun and Real Wins

If you’ve ever wanted to try real money pokies...

Follow the Plotline, Download the Experience on Ceritafilm

A New Way to Explore Films with Just One...
spot_img